![]() ‐ Having 50% or more of students eligible for free or reduced‐price meals. ‐ Having 50% or more of the students eligible for free or reduced‐price meals and having seventh and eighth grades within the same building (for follow‐up purposes). School type: Middle Schools (7 th and 8 th grades).ĭemographic/socioeconomic characteristics: Low‐income middle schools (the mean percentage of students eligible for free/reduced‐price meals for schools in the SNAK project was 68% (range, 50% to 98%), which was similar to all Michigan low‐income middle schools in 2007 (72% n = 514). Some differences were apparent in school location and kitchen type but no P values were reported. Table 2 reports difference at baseline in school characteristics. There were some significant differences at baseline with regard to student dietary intake (all subsequent analyses adjusted for baseline dietary values). Cohort 2 students completed baseline surveys between November 2008 and February 2009 and the follow‐up survey between October 2009 and January 2010.ĭifferences in baseline characteristics: There were no significant differences among intervention groups with regard to school characteristics at baseline. Students in cohort 1 completed the baseline survey between November 2007 and March 2008 and the follow‐up survey between October and December 2008. Length of follow‐up from baseline: Follow‐up occurred in the next school year. Intervention duration: The study involved two overlapping cohorts: 1 year 9 month per cohort, 2 years 9 months both cohorts: Trial name: School Nutrition Advances Kids (SNAK). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |